Money from Trees
Rising
support for carbon caps means new choices for farmers and landowners.
Growing
food and raising livestock contribute more carbon dioxide to the Earth's
atmosphere than does transportation, according to the United Nations. Agriculture is one of the
leading causes of deforestation, a key global warming contributor. By
some estimates, 35% of the Earth's surface (not under ice) is devoted to
food production, primarily to livestock cultivation. Bio-waste from
cows, goats, pigs and other livestock accounts for roughly 37% of the
methane in the atmosphere. Yet, farmers and ranchers will probably be among the
first to profit from tomorrow's low-carbon economy.
In a new Duke University
report titled Harnessing Farms and Forests in the Low-Carbon Economy,
scientists from universities across the United States provide a guide to
help farmers and landowners tap into and trade their lands' precious
carbon-storing properties.
"Farmers can remove carbon
dioxide from the atmosphere and sequester it as soil carbon by changing
tillage practices," the editors write in the introduction. "If farmers
and forest landowners can be compensated for their actions to reduce
emissions or sequester greenhouse gases, they can benefit economically
from these efforts."
Using low-till or no-till
farming practices and raising smaller animals that produce less waste
(such as sheep instead of cows) have measurable impacts on reducing
carbon output. Today's farmers and ranchers also have the option of
converting their land to carbon depositories or "sinks," by allowing
trees to grow larger before logging or by replanting grasslands and
forests.
But is there any money in
it?
"Recent studies by Kansas
State University and others have indicated that carbon [offsets] could
be an $8 billion market for agriculture," reports Dick Wittman, a member
of the Agricultural Carbon Market Working Group.
The Low-Carbon Economy
However slowly or subtlety,
the transition toward a low-carbon economy is already underway. Some 35
developed countries have ratified the Kyoto Protocol, vowing to reduce
their carbon output by 5 % to 8% below 1990 levels. One of the most
popular methods for meeting reduction goals is the cap-and-trade system,
wherein regulators set a total carbon allowance or "cap" for carbon
emitters such as electric utilities, factories, or, in the case of the
Kyoto Protocol, entire nations. The carbon emitters can then turn to
the free market to meet their cap by:
• Investing in cleaner
technology or more-efficient business practices to reduce their
emissions.
• Purchasing allowances from
other emitters that have reduced their CO2 output.
• Buying carbon "offsets,"
which remove carbon from the air from individuals or entities such as
forest owners and carbon-sink operators.
The potential profit for
landowners from cap-and-trade may be big. In 2005, the Environmental
Protection Agency found that, as the price of offsets rose, the number
of farmers and landowners who expressed interest in participating in the
offset market grew steadily. But for a trade system to work, governments
must enact and enforce CO2 caps. While several individual U.S. (e.g.,
California, Maryland, and New York) have adopted mandatory carbon
reduction goals, neither China nor the United States, the world's two
largest emitters of CO2 respectively, has yet adopted caps on carbon
emissions at the national level. Observers believe that mandatory
emissions caps are a near certainty in the future. In a recent Stanford
University poll, 85% of Americans surveyed said that they believed
global warming was probably happening, and 73% favored mandatory
restrictions on power generators, even if those restrictions resulted in
a $10 rise in their monthly electric bill. Only 47% supported the
somewhat more lenient cap-and-trade solution. The Duke researchers
suggest that, if cap-and-trade were better understood and more
rigorously enforced, carbon markets would realize greater public
support.
"A comprehensive cap on
carbon will guarantee reductions in global warming pollution while
stimulating new technologies. Designed well, it will move people to
sequester in carbon in the ground and in forests," they conclude.—Patrick
Tucker
Source: Harnessing Farms
and Forests in the Low-Carbon Economy: How to Create, Measure, and
Verify Greenhouse Gas Offsets, edited by Zach Willey and Bill Chameides.
The Nicholas Institute for Environmental and Policy Solutions. Duke
University Press. 2007. Web site
www.dukeupress.edu .
Photo credit: ISTOCKPHOTO.COM
To order the print edition of the
January-February 2008 issue of THE FUTURIST or to become a
member of the World
Future Society ($49 per year).
COPYRIGHT © 2007 WORLD FUTURE SOCIETY, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 450, Bethesda,
Maryland 20814. Tel. 301-656-8274. E-mail info@wfs.org. Web site
http://www.wfs.org. All rights
reserved.